Skip to content

Thoughtspark - Smart content to ignite your business

ThoughtSpark
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Capabilities
  • Clients
  • Thoughtsparks
    • Our Thoughtsparks
    • Thursday Thoughtsparks
    • Pour Femme
  • Get In Touch
Thursday Thoughtsparks

Do you benefit from a research company’s brand?

  • Paul Lindsell
  • August 8, 2024

So I started the week with another case of ‘pass the sick bag, Alice’.

For the sixth time in as many weeks, I’ve heard people saying – “I’d like to use XYZ research firm because they’re a good brand for when we publish the results…”

What utter tosh.

This time it came from another agency, who really should know better.

Let me be clear, though. This isn’t a blame thing. Research is part of our bread and butter. Belief in any reflected value from a research company’s brand is simply naivety, nothing more.

Do I mean that a research company’s brand is worthless? No, of course not.

A research brand, based on reputation for quality panels, rigorous analytics and high-touch customer service, is very valuable indeed. In other words, it can inform your choice of who to use in terms of the quality of their product/service. NOT, however, any thought of leveraging their brand when you publish the results (in my humblest of opinions).

No-one cares who did the fieldwork.

They care about the story the results tell!

My best example to illustrate this point is the range of research fieldwork companies who published their polls in the run up to the recent UK election.

There were literally scores of them.

Within the usual bounds of expected volatility, most of their results turned out to be broadly valid.

And did the media favour one over any other? Did they frequently highlight or name-check anyone?

No.

Almost all media outlets were at pains to publish ‘poll-of-polls’ results, featuring no individual pollster.

That’s because the actual quality of the research fieldwork product from each of them is – to my mind – virtually indistinguishable. The statistical techniques are much the same. The maths is much the same. The panel quality is pretty much the same.

The way they compete is on service, support, analytics and so on.

Now this is just my view, and it may induce howls of protest.

But it’s my experience, and I’m sticking with it.

And I have never – in all the feedback we’ve had over twenty years – heard of someone saying that their opinion of survey results was influenced by who the pollster was… they’ve only ever commented on the content and results themselves.

  • Categories: Thursday Thoughtsparks

Share this article

Our Latest Thursday Thoughtsparks

Does AI mean mass unemployment in marketing?
Sarah Nurgat
June 5, 2025
Are all business leaders dreadful egotists?
Paul Lindsell
May 29, 2025
Is the environmental drive dead in the water?
Paul Lindsell
May 23, 2025
Isn’t it just so important to stay in touch?
Paul Lindsell
May 15, 2025
Kind AND tough in the workplace – is it possible?
Paul Lindsell
May 9, 2025
Posting on LinkedIn – what signifies real engagement?
Paul Lindsell
May 1, 2025
« Previous Page1 Page2 Page3 … Page11 Next »
#ThursdayThoughtSparks
Pour Femme
#ThursdayThoughtSparks

Receive a ThoughtSpark every Thursday

Our tips on ESG Comms, Marketing and Management.
Pour Femme

Sign up to receive our newsletter Pour Femme

Fortnightly PR and marketing reads for the women’s health & femtech community.
Quote Mark - Start

We live in stirring times, tea-stirring times.

— Christopher Isherwood
Quote Mark - End
ThoughtSpark
Copyright © 2025 ThoughtSpark. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • Get In Touch
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Capabilities
  • Clients
  • Thoughtsparks
    • Our Thoughtsparks
    • Thursday Thoughtsparks
    • Pour Femme
  • Get In Touch